Every season I watch Joe Torre manage the Yankees
and fight off those envious, "Why can't we get
guys like that?" feelings. For as long as I can
remember, my beloved Red Sox have been managed by a
harrowing collection of boozers, incompetents,
senior citizens and idiot savants. When Boston
management finally brought in a manager this year
who seemed relatively intelligent -- Joe Kerrigan --
the team immediately free-fell into one of the most
dreadful slumps in franchise history. Go figure.
On the heels of Jimy Williams' inexplicably
successful "Rain Man" routine, Kerrigan's
collossal failure was one of my most dumbfounding
experiences as a sports fan. For most of the summer,
I had no explanation for what was happening. None.
As the time passed and the losses mounted, I began
to wonder if managing a baseball team was even all
that difficult.
|
|
 |
| Joe
Torre just wins, baby. |
For instance, in football, we know that head
coaches matter. We know this. Teams assume
the personality of their coaches, for better and
worse; as casual observers, we can always determine
which teams seem prepared, which teams play the
hardest and which teams consistently seem to have
three or four wrinkles per game up their sleeves.
Between those brutal workdays, dozens of important
decisions per game, 53 players to select and manage,
suffocating media pressure and a staggering amount
of plays and formations to remember, you could
almost argue that coaching an NFL team is like
racing an automobile -- hands on, all the time, life
or death.
Managing a baseball team? That's like serving as the
captain of a luxury yacht. You rely on your
equipment, manage your crew, defer to their
abilities, stroke egos and search for icebergs.
That's it. That's your job. Basically, you're
Captain Stubing. As long as Doc takes care of the
sick passengers, Julie handles the social events,
Isaac mixes martinis, Gopher stays out of trouble
and the "Love Boat" isn't ramming into
anything, you're golden.
So what makes Joe Torre so special? What makes
him stand out? From what I can gather, five reasons
explain his good fortune:
1. He's a good guy.
2. He knows how to handle the media.
3. He has the requisite "attention to
detail" skills.
4. He doesn't get in the way.
5. He plays hunches consistently well.
None of those seem like overwhelmingly special
qualities. And yet managers continue to fail, one
after the other. Sift through the majors right now
and only a handful of managers command sweeping,
"If this guy ever leaves Team X, he'll be out
of a job for about 30 seconds," respect from
people in and around the game: Torre, Bruce Bochy,
Dusty Baker, Bobby Valentine, Tony La Russa, Lou
Piniella and Jim Leyland (who isn't even managing).
That's it. That's the list.
I ask you again ... why does Torre succeed where
so many others have failed?
Let's examine those five "reasons" in
detail:
1. He's a good guy
|
|
 |
| Good
guy Torre kisses Jose Vizcaino after Game 1
of the 2000 World Series. |
Torre's players adore him because he sticks up for
them, he believes in them, he never embarrasses
them, he protects them, he always offers them
explanations (if they get bumped from a start, if
they get benched and so on) and he probably squashes
a variety of personality crises behind the scenes
that never see the light of day. There's something
fatherly about him; he's like a giant teddy bear.
When he gets choked up after a pivotal Yankees
victory, he seems genuine, and that's a rarity in
sports today.
Of course -- and this is crucial -- the
"Good Guy" routine only thrives on a team
loaded with Good Guys, as well as three to four
players who lead by example and keep potentially
disruptive teammates in line. Would Torre have
captured four titles in five years without veteran
leadership from his unique group of
"throwback" players? Of course not.
Torre succeeded with the Yankees because of six
words: right man, right place, right time. Stick him
with the Melrose Place Red Sox this season, and he
would have bombed almost as spectacularly as
Kerrigan did; without any strong leaders in the
clubhouse, Torre would have been overwhelmed like
Michelle Pfeiffer during the first 20 minutes of
"Dangerous Minds."
And if you don't believe me, remember this: Joe
Torre has been fired as a major-league manager three
different times. Count 'em... three.
2. He knows how to
handle the media
They call them "managers" for a reason:
The word describes someone who manages a group of
people over an extended period of time. And except
for -- possibly even including -- dealing with
players, dealing with the media is the toughest part
of the job, by all accounts. Nobody can sidetrack a
season more quickly than pesky reporters, sarcastic
print columnists and cranky talk radio hosts. You
need to be able to play the game and avoid every
possible land mine. Easier said than done.
Just remember, once the fans lose faith in you,
that seeps into the clubhouse -- especially when
those pesky reporters start throwing gasoline on the
fire -- and then it's only a matter of time. To
Torre's credit, he manipulated the New York media
beautifully over the past six seasons, maybe his
most remarkable skill. In a town where everybody
rips everybody, Torre has somehow remained beyond
reproach.
(Note: Some managers last longer than they should
because of their ability to endear themselves to the
media and their players. We saw it happen here in
Boston with a man named Joe Morgan, who parlayed a
quirky sense of humor and an interim manager's tag
into an astounding four-year run, including a
301-262 record and two division titles ... and yet
Morgan made so many inexplicable in-game decisions
over that span that he never worked in the majors
again after getting fired in 1992. A little love and
a few jokes can travel a long way in this business.)
3. He has the requisite
"attention to detail" skills
|
|
 |
| Torre
has the unbeatable combination of being
lucky and good. |
Baseball managers make a staggering amount of
decisions during the average game, but 95 percent of
them are no-brainers: Don't start your catcher in
both ends of a doubleheader, don't warm up your
relievers in every game (but warm them up at the
right times), play the lefty-righty matchups to your
advantage, rest your everyday stars every so often,
use everyone on your bench as much as possible to
keep them fresh, monitor the pitch counts of your
starters, and so on. Could the Average Joe make
those decisions? Absolutely.
With that said, specific circumstances require at
least a modicum of savvy, which seems to be largely
predicated on the manager not falling asleep at the
wheel. And that's where Torre really excels -- his
team always have a chance to win close games because
he consistently puts them in a position to win close
games. For instance, he possesses an uncanny knack
for the following things:
A. Pulling a starter at the right time
Monday's game was a perfect example -- Clemens was
fading and Torre pulled the trigger right before the
wheels came off. Easier said than done. He's a
master at this.
B. Managing his bullpen
This seems to be a place in which managers can
stumble, but it's much easier than you would
think... even if some managers don't make it seem
that way. But Torre definitely has a knack for
moving relievers in and out, keeping everyone fresh
and instinctively knowing when he can rely on Mariano
Rivera for more than one inning.
(Of course, it helps to have Rivera on your team
in the first place, but the fact remains that Torre
has cajoled six straight healthy seasons from Rivera
without a serious injury. Warrants mentioning.)
C. Playing the odds (the lefty/righty thing)
Again, it's not impossible to figure out, but you
still need to remember 100 different trivial stats
-- who hits well against lefties, who can't hit a
certain pitcher, who hits better from the right
side, etc. -- and incorporate them into your
decision-making process during the game. We could
pull this off from the sofa, but what if we were
sitting in the dugout with 230 other things going on
at the same time? Probably not.
D. Avoiding bonehead moves
Maybe Torre's most underrated trait. For instance,
during Kerrigan's second week on the job, the Sox
went into extra innings in Texas, all the way to the
18th, and Derek B. Lowe loaded the bases with one
out and (the lead-footed) Bill
Haselman at the plate. With Texas only needing
one run to win the game, Kerrigan kept the infield
back; even as it was happening, Sox announcer Jerry
Remy was deeming it a mistake and pointing out the
possibility of a slow roller (because Lowe was a
ground ball pitcher).
Sure enough, Haselman dribbled a grounder to
short for a game-winning force-out. Had Boston's
infield played in, the Sox could have thrown out the
lead runner at home -- just a brutal turn of events
that inadvertently jump-started a 6-23 stretch over
the next month, knocked the Sox out of the playoff
race and caused me to walk to my local convenience
store at 2:45 in the morning to buy some Sour Patch
Kids and bitch about the game to Joe the Alcoholic
Counter Guy (he was the only person I knew who was
up at the time).
Here's my point: those kinds of things never seem
to happen to Torre's teams. After awhile, you stop
calling it a "coincidence."
4. He doesn't get in the
way
As Joe Theismann once said, "Great players make
great plays." And great managers, for the most
part, stay the hell out of the way. Remember when
Arizona's Bob Brenly ordered a suicide squeeze
during Game 5 of the Diamondbacks-Cardinals series?
Ninth inning, tie game, guy on third base, one out, Tony
Womack at the plate... and Brenly thought to
himself, "Hey, I can be the hero!" And he
almost killed his team.
For some reason, some baseball managers
mistakenly believe that they're playing chess, when
they're really playing checkers most of the time.
That's the Tony La Russa Syndrome, when a manager
tries too many things in an effort to remind
everyone that, "Hey, I'm a very important man
performing a very important job here!" Will you
ever forget La Russa agonizing in the dugout during
last year's playoffs, wondering when he should
finally grace us with this "Now pinch-hitting, Mark
McGwire" decision every game? You would
have thought he was JFK during the Cuban Missile
Crisis. The ongoing saga distracted the Cards and
helped squash their season.
(Note: I always believed that the "you have
to think four moves ahead" routine was
overrated -- like when a lefty and a righty are
warming up in the bullpen and you have to decide,
"If I bring in Pinch-Hitter A, then Pitcher B
comes in, but Pinch-Hitter B would cause Pitcher A
to come in, so that would mean Scenario C over
Scenario D" and so on. Just carry a notepad,
write out all the possible matchups and
sub-scenarios and act accordingly. It's like the
easiest calculus test of all-time. I will not argue
about this.)
Torre would rather play checkers than chess. He
rarely strays from a set-in-stone, 1-through-9
lineup, avoids dramatic personnel moves and shies
away from the La Russa Syndrome whenever possible,
cultivating a "Here's my best, see if you can
top this" mentality, an unwavering confidence
that seems to invigorate his players. For instance,
during Game 5 of the Oakland series, Ramiro
Mendoza could have started the eighth, followed
by Andy Pettitte coming in for a lefty/lefty matchup
... and then Torre could have deferred to Mariano
Rivera for three to four outs. Nope. Rivera started
the eighth. If the Yankee dynasty was getting
toppled, Torre believed, it would have to happen
with his best pitcher on the mound.
With that said, a good manager shouldn't be
afraid to jump-start his team when they absolutely,
positively need it -- it's like Judge Smails pulling
out the old Billy Baroo for a crucial putt. Torre
pulled a number of those moves in Game 5: benching Paul
O'Neill for Randy
Velarde, moving Velarde into the No. 2 spot,
pulling Roger
Clemens in the fifth and pinch-hitting Dave
Justice in the sixth inning. Every one of the moves
worked. Velarde's insertion moved Alfonso
Soriano down to the No. 9 spot, where he
delivered a clutch two-run single. Mike
Stanton and Mendoza kept the Yankees alive in
the middle innings. And Justice delivered a pivotal
home run.
And sure, Soriano could have gone 0-for-4, and
Stanton could have self-destructed, and Justice
could have struck out. Sometimes, you need a little
luck, too.
Which reminds me...
5. He plays hunches
consistently well
And that's just about everything here. Managing a
baseball team almost seems like playing blackjack.
Most times you know when to double down, or when to
stay on "16," or when to take another hit
and everything else... but then you have those
"Gray Area" hands, like when you have a
"12" and the dealer has a "2"
showing. Should you take a hit? It's impossible to
say. With a "12," you have about a 50
percent chance of staying alive in the hand with
your next card and a "20 percent chance of
pulling a card that might actually help you. But the
odds are less than 50 percent that the dealer will
bust with a "2" showing. It's a judgment
call ... and it's enough to drive you insane.
That's what happens in baseball. You have to pay
attention constantly, stick to your guns and follow
the book 95 percent of the time... except for those
occasional moments when you're sitting on
"12" and the other team has a
"2" showing. And sometimes this happens
with a big wager sitting on the table, which is when
things get really interesting. There are no
"right moves" and no "wrong
moves"; you just have to hope you're lucky more
times than you're unlucky. It's that simple.
Quick example: During Game 5 of the
Indians-Mariners series, Charlie Manuel left righty
ace Bartolo
Colon on the mound during a 2-1 game, in the
seventh inning, with Colon hovering around the
90-pitch mark and lefty Ichiro
Suzuki (batting roughly .960 lifetime against
Colon) and switchhitter Mark
McLemore (like Elton John, much more effective
from the left side) on deck. Suzuki singled. So did
McLemore. And Cleveland's season was finished within
45 minutes.
Two potential explanations for Colon remaining in
the game: A) Charlie had fallen asleep and didn't
wake up in time, and B) Charlie was playing a hunch.
What's the answer? Frankly, it's impossible to say.
But if Charlie had woken up in time to bring in Ricardo
Rincon, and Rincon had promptly yielded singles
to Suzuki and McLemore, everyone in Cleveland would
have been saying, "How could you yank your ace
after 90 pitches?" on Tuesday, instead of what
they were actually saying ("How could you not
bring in a lefty?").
So what would Torre have done? I'm guessing he
would have chosen Option B (bringing in Rincon).
Why?
Because Option A (keeping in Colon) didn't work,
and Torre has a proven knack for making correct
decisions at the most crucial times. Intentional or
unintentional, intuitive or fortunate... that's just
the way it's been and it continues to be. Joe Torre
has the Midas Touch. If baseball were blackjack,
Torre would be sitting in the third base seat with a
stack of chips in front of him, a smile on his face
and the pit boss staring a hole through his
forehead.
Sure, you could argue that Torre knows his team
that well, or that he surrounds himself with coaches
who provide him with sage advice (like the ageless
Don Zimmer, the real-life Yoda), or even that he's
somewhat clairvoyant (you never know). You could
argue that he's a good man who led a good life and
just happens to have good karma because of it. You
could even argue that it's all of the above.
But some people are just lucky. Whether it's
blackjack, craps, lottery tickets, Monopoly, love,
money, you name it... there comes a point when the
"sheer coincidences" just start adding up.
I think that can happen with baseball managers, and
I definitely think that's what has happened here
with Joe Torre over the last few years. And maybe
that doesn't account for everything, but it
certainly explains at least some of his success.
He's lucky and he's good. Quite a combination.
When you add everything up, managing a baseball
team isn't all that difficult, but managing a
baseball team successfully.... well, that's another
story. Even if baseball managers resemble yacht
captains most of the time, those proverbial icebergs
can still sink their ships. And even if managing
during games seems like a much more exciting version
of blackjack, and there's more luck than skill for
much of the time, certain people still have a knack
for walking away from the table with rows of chips.
You need to know your place, you need to be smooth,
you need to pay attention to detail, and most of
all, you need to be lucky.
Lucky and good.